<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Enough said</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wilks1.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wilks1.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>"Sometimes I sits and thinks, and then again I just sits"</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 12:00:02 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on The arrogance of power by Memex 1.1 &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Power, thuggery and bad manners</title>
		<link>http://wilks1.wordpress.com/2008/06/29/the-arrogance-of-power/#comment-197</link>
		<dc:creator>Memex 1.1 &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Power, thuggery and bad manners</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 21:22:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wilks1.wordpress.com/?p=131#comment-197</guid>
		<description>[...] on Gordon Brown&#8217;s brutish way with his subordinates. This post was, in turn picked up by Wilks in a post entitled &#8220;The Arrogance of Power&#8221;, which in turn pointed to a really [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] on Gordon Brown&#8217;s brutish way with his subordinates. This post was, in turn picked up by Wilks in a post entitled &#8220;The Arrogance of Power&#8221;, which in turn pointed to a really [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on More on 42 days by How much do we mind? Not a lot, it seems, &#171; Enough said</title>
		<link>http://wilks1.wordpress.com/2008/06/16/more-on-42-days/#comment-193</link>
		<dc:creator>How much do we mind? Not a lot, it seems, &#171; Enough said</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 22:11:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wilks1.wordpress.com/?p=127#comment-193</guid>
		<description>[...] much do we mind? Not a lot, it&#160;seems,  Not long after posting More on 42 days last week, I read The Economist&#8217;s take on the erosion of civil liberties, Mary Poppins and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] much do we mind? Not a lot, it&nbsp;seems,  Not long after posting More on 42 days last week, I read The Economist&#8217;s take on the erosion of civil liberties, Mary Poppins and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Stopping at nothing by replaceable</title>
		<link>http://wilks1.wordpress.com/2008/05/26/stopping-at-nothing/#comment-187</link>
		<dc:creator>replaceable</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 14:41:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wilks1.wordpress.com/?p=123#comment-187</guid>
		<description>replaceable says : I absolutely agree with this !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>replaceable says : I absolutely agree with this !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Stopping at nothing by Jamie Holts</title>
		<link>http://wilks1.wordpress.com/2008/05/26/stopping-at-nothing/#comment-185</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamie Holts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 11:34:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wilks1.wordpress.com/?p=123#comment-185</guid>
		<description>I found your site on Google and read a few of your other entires.  Nice Stuff.  I'm looking forward to reading more from you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found your site on Google and read a few of your other entires.  Nice Stuff.  I&#8217;m looking forward to reading more from you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Whither the legal profession? by Words matter? &#171; Enough said</title>
		<link>http://wilks1.wordpress.com/2008/05/17/whither-the-legal-profession/#comment-181</link>
		<dc:creator>Words matter? &#171; Enough said</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 10:38:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wilks1.wordpress.com/?p=117#comment-181</guid>
		<description>[...] not just lawyers in the UK that are concerned about their professional standing (see my recent post Whither the legal profession? The same is true in  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] not just lawyers in the UK that are concerned about their professional standing (see my recent post Whither the legal profession? The same is true in  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The tyranny of time by We measure out our lives in 6 minute units &#171; Enough said</title>
		<link>http://wilks1.wordpress.com/2008/04/27/the-tyranny-of-time/#comment-172</link>
		<dc:creator>We measure out our lives in 6 minute units &#171; Enough said</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 10:31:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wilks1.wordpress.com/?p=115#comment-172</guid>
		<description>[...] measure out our lives in 6 minute&#160;units  A follow on to my post on The tyranny of time. Today in the FT, Megan Murphy asks whether it Time to stop the lawyers&#8217; clock, and cites [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] measure out our lives in 6 minute&nbsp;units  A follow on to my post on The tyranny of time. Today in the FT, Megan Murphy asks whether it Time to stop the lawyers&#8217; clock, and cites [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Shrewd Bill is still Slick Willy by Shrewd Bill is still Slick Willy</title>
		<link>http://wilks1.wordpress.com/2008/03/17/shrewd-bill-is-still-slick-willy/#comment-80</link>
		<dc:creator>Shrewd Bill is still Slick Willy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 23:24:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wilks1.wordpress.com/?p=92#comment-80</guid>
		<description>[...] ChrisWeigant.com wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerpt A fascinating column from Clive Crook in the FT today, on Bill Clinton’s play of a joint Clinton-Obama ticket. After setting the context (Obama ahead in elected delegates after Pennsylvania but not enough to settle the nomination), he comments This swirling uncertainty is the context in which Bill Clinton’s recent claim that a Clinton-Obama ticket would be unstoppable must be understood. It was an extremely shrewd political manoeuvre. It asserts a presumption, nothing if not bold, that Mrs Cl [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ChrisWeigant.com wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerpt A fascinating column from Clive Crook in the FT today, on Bill Clinton’s play of a joint Clinton-Obama ticket. After setting the context (Obama ahead in elected delegates after Pennsylvania but not enough to settle the nomination), he comments This swirling uncertainty is the context in which Bill Clinton’s recent claim that a Clinton-Obama ticket would be unstoppable must be understood. It was an extremely shrewd political manoeuvre. It asserts a presumption, nothing if not bold, that Mrs Cl [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The going rate by Bree</title>
		<link>http://wilks1.wordpress.com/2008/03/14/the-going-rate/#comment-68</link>
		<dc:creator>Bree</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 21:07:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wilks1.wordpress.com/?p=88#comment-68</guid>
		<description>Why are you surprised?  What would you have expected the figure to be?

Just curious.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why are you surprised?  What would you have expected the figure to be?</p>
<p>Just curious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Graduate divas by Sarah Stimson</title>
		<link>http://wilks1.wordpress.com/2008/02/07/graduate-divas/#comment-66</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah Stimson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 15:37:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wilks1.wordpress.com/?p=48#comment-66</guid>
		<description>I'm so glad someone else wrote about this.  I tore this article out of the Standard and it's been sat on my desk ever since, daring me to write about it and I've yet to find the time!

I recruit grads and I can tell you this, in the current climate of economic decline grads will be in far less demand than they think.  Even the good ones.  The most successful graduates will be those that pull out all the stops to get relevant work experience onto their limited CVs - and are totally humble about doing it in the process.

The problem with Liz's article is that some of it is simply not true.  She says ".....they are clever and gorgeous.  And unlike my inept generation, they have social skills......"  Well, I beg to differ.  Some do, and those grads will go on to do very well thank you very much.  But a good 75% of the graduates I see are lacking in confidence, focus and basic office etiquette.  I gave a talk at a university about getting your first job the other day and one of the students said "but, like, they want me to know about Word and Excel just to do work experience and you don't use that stuff in the real world".  I gently informed him that in fact the real world does indeed expect him to have some basic word processing and spreedsheet knowledge.  Before I started recruiting grads I had no idea how few of them know what happens when you go to work.  Simple things like how to answer a telephone professionally, what "cc" means on an email, and how to write a thank you note to someone who has given up their time to meet you.

I'd also be keen to meet the grads that Liz Hoggard knows that have "facialits and trainers....".  I don't have a facialist, or a trainer and I've been working for 15 years!  Where are these lucky grads with oodles of disposable income?!

She laughs at how they are "brilliant laid-back" because they do things like start interviews with "you alright mate."  It's no laughing matter I assure you.   When I interview grads I spend 20 minutes interviewing them, and 40 minutes telling them what they SHOULD have said and how they SHOULD have behaved and what they SHOULD wear to their next interview.  They need just as much hand holding as previous generations of graduates.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m so glad someone else wrote about this.  I tore this article out of the Standard and it&#8217;s been sat on my desk ever since, daring me to write about it and I&#8217;ve yet to find the time!</p>
<p>I recruit grads and I can tell you this, in the current climate of economic decline grads will be in far less demand than they think.  Even the good ones.  The most successful graduates will be those that pull out all the stops to get relevant work experience onto their limited CVs - and are totally humble about doing it in the process.</p>
<p>The problem with Liz&#8217;s article is that some of it is simply not true.  She says &#8220;&#8230;..they are clever and gorgeous.  And unlike my inept generation, they have social skills&#8230;&#8230;&#8221;  Well, I beg to differ.  Some do, and those grads will go on to do very well thank you very much.  But a good 75% of the graduates I see are lacking in confidence, focus and basic office etiquette.  I gave a talk at a university about getting your first job the other day and one of the students said &#8220;but, like, they want me to know about Word and Excel just to do work experience and you don&#8217;t use that stuff in the real world&#8221;.  I gently informed him that in fact the real world does indeed expect him to have some basic word processing and spreedsheet knowledge.  Before I started recruiting grads I had no idea how few of them know what happens when you go to work.  Simple things like how to answer a telephone professionally, what &#8220;cc&#8221; means on an email, and how to write a thank you note to someone who has given up their time to meet you.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d also be keen to meet the grads that Liz Hoggard knows that have &#8220;facialits and trainers&#8230;.&#8221;.  I don&#8217;t have a facialist, or a trainer and I&#8217;ve been working for 15 years!  Where are these lucky grads with oodles of disposable income?!</p>
<p>She laughs at how they are &#8220;brilliant laid-back&#8221; because they do things like start interviews with &#8220;you alright mate.&#8221;  It&#8217;s no laughing matter I assure you.   When I interview grads I spend 20 minutes interviewing them, and 40 minutes telling them what they SHOULD have said and how they SHOULD have behaved and what they SHOULD wear to their next interview.  They need just as much hand holding as previous generations of graduates.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Matching pension liabilities by Another nail in the coffin of DB &#171; Enough said</title>
		<link>http://wilks1.wordpress.com/2008/03/03/matching-pension-liabilities/#comment-59</link>
		<dc:creator>Another nail in the coffin of DB &#171; Enough said</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 18:38:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wilks1.wordpress.com/?p=78#comment-59</guid>
		<description>[...] nail in the coffin of&#160;DB  Further to my post earlier in the week, Matching pension liabilities, the story that led the front page of the FT today, Companies face bigger pensions risk levy, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] nail in the coffin of&nbsp;DB  Further to my post earlier in the week, Matching pension liabilities, the story that led the front page of the FT today, Companies face bigger pensions risk levy, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
